Quote:
Dammika wrote:
Quote:
Quote:
Sp said: In any other country the voters would punish this kind of misfits (of both sides) first in opinion polls and then at the elections. But once again this is not a ‘normal’ country. This is sunny Sri Lanka! So don’t expect any dramas from the voters either!
Elections are the only legitimate punishment for a crime in a democratic system. If both parties, govt and opposition are acting like profound genius with only self interest in mind, what is the public to do at the election? What choices the voters have?
This is a riddle in the system, the weakness of the system.
A proof that theory cannot grasp reality when it comes to system under stress
due to the rulers and the ruled.. and mass people behaviour
Practical common sense would say - the public should still select someone - perhaps the lesser evil ..
How to assess the system - when the executive and legislative segments fail, the
judiciary atleast should not. The judiciary should kick itself to life when the other wings of power
are breaking the system. Often they won't unless someone lodges a formal case/complaint. And in some
govts they are indirectly leashed by the legislative/executive who have the veto power to overrule judiciary.
If the judiciary cannot kick itself to life, then people should do it.
Finally, here is what happens - people are unwilling/unable to legally take on the failing
executive/legislature to task.
No wonder that thinkers say that we all get the govts we deserve; collectively it's all about
govt of, by and for the people. Most of the world is loosening in the standards of governance
just as people are loosening in their own standards - because it is the people who run the govts,
not machines. The better ones make it better, but they come once in a long while.
_________________
*I am not the only one*