Asipatha wrote:
Of course she should be banned from all Buddhsit temples and should be disregarded by all Buddhists. First she promised to discuss JM wiht maha sangha and then betrayed by signing it secretly. This is the time to challange her betrayals and lies.
She lied not only to the maha snagha but to her own parliamentarians. The draft distibuted among deputy ministers was not the authentic original paper. CBK is a puppet of Norway. I Norwegian citizenship is granted to her because there is no place to hide here except the cave of Pirapaharan.
Asipatha,
I was a little pertubed by your signature. This is not very helpful in the current climate but I am sure you are not too bothered by my view. However, I thought you may be interested in an old introduction to a book I read recently. It goes:
"The inventive narration of the founding of Sri Lanka with the arrival of the sinhalese is a case in point. The story surrounding Vijaya, the supposed founder of the sinhalese race, as is given in the Mahavamsa is not only fanciful but sordid as well. The sinhalese people,it is said,are descendants of an 'amorous' princess in the country of the Vangas (Bengal in India) who mated with a lion! The soothsayers had 'prophesied her union with the king of beasts', says the chronicle,'and for shame the king and queen could not suffer her'. So she left her home,seeking an independent life and joined a caravan. What follows is an intriguing account that has all the drama that would make a good Hollywood blockbuster!.
The caravan was travelling to the 'Magadha country' and on the way a lion attacked it in the forest. While 'the other folk fled this way and that' the princess fled along the way by which the lion had come.'when the lion had taken his prey and was leaving the spot he beheld her from afar,love(for her) laid hold on him,and he came towards her with waving tail and ears laid back. Seeing him she bethought her of that prophecy of the soothsayer which she had heard,and without fear she caressed him stroking his limbs. The lion, roused to fiercest passion by her touch, took her upon his back and bore her with all speed to his cave, and there he united with her, and from this union with him the princess in time bore twin-children, a son and daughter'. The son's hand and feet were formed like a lion's and the mother named him Si(n)habahu. The daughter was named Si(n)hasivali. Thus they lived in the lion's cave for sixteen years.
Now, it was the lion's habbit to close the cave entrance with a rock before setting forth in search of prey. When Sihabahu was sixteen, he asked his mother:'wherefore are you and our father so different, dear mother?' So she told him. The next thing that happened was of course what could be called in contemporary terms, a case of malicious desertion! When the lionhad gone out in search of prey, young Sihabahu dislodged the rock that covered the cave, carried his mother and sister on his two shoulders, clothed themselves with branches of trees and escaped to the border village.When the lion returned and found the wife and children gone, 'he was sorrowful, and geieving after his son, he neither ate nor drank', says the Mahavamsa. He set forth in search of them in neighbouring villages, and wherever he went, the people fled in fear. They then went to the king and told him:'A lion ravages thy country; ward off (this danger) O King'. The king offered a reward of a thousand gold pieces to anyone who would bringthe lion's head. Since there were no takers, he increased the reward in turn to two thousand and then three thousand gold pieces. Sihabahu accepted the promise of reward and despite his mother restraining him went to his father's cave. As soon as the lion saw his son, he came forward with love towards him. Sihabahu's arrow struck the lion's forehead, but because of his tenderness towards his son, the arrow rebounded and fell on the earth at the youth's feet. And so it fell three times, but 'then did the king of beasts grow wrathful and the arrow sent at him struck him and pierced his body'.
Sihabahu took the head of the lion with the mane and returned to the city to receive a hero's welcome. In course of time, he founded the new 'kingdom of Lala', made Sihasivali (his sister) the queen, and by her had 'twin sons sixteen times', thirty two sons in all. The eldest of them was named Vijaya whom the king consecrated as prince-regent. Vijaya, according to the Mahavamsa, turned out to be 'of eveil conduct'. He , and his followers, seven hundred of them, perpetrated ' many intolerable deeds of violence' that angered the people.The father Sihabahu lost his patience, half-shaved the heads of the lot of them and put them on a ship banishing them from his kingdom. It was this Vijaya who eventually landed in Lanka and founded the Sinhala race, according to the Chronicle.
Not a pleasant way to trace the origin of the sinhala people - a story of animal descent, an over-sexed princess, a parricide father, an incestuous marriage and a wicked son banished by his people! One would have expected the Sinhalese people to have dismissed this story of a shameful genealogy from their minds, and laughed it off - given their habitual sense of humor- (unlike the Tamils, they have a greater capacity to laugh at themselves) as arrant nonsense. But alas, their politicians were of a different mould. When the leaders of predominantly Hindu India opted for the 'Asoka Chakra', with its Buddhist connotation of peace as the national emblem at the time of independence, the buddhist leaders of Sri Lanka who claim that the island is the first and final repository of Buddhism, Ahimsa and Maithreye decided to make a ferocious-looking lion holding a sword on its paw as their flag and emblem!'.
I think there is something you can learn from this.